Cases 21 - 30 of 59
E.R. et al v. Mid-America Transplant Services et al
as 4:2017cv02260
Plaintiff:
E.R. , M.T. , C.M. and others
Defendant:
Mid-America Transplant Services, Tommy Greenwell, Josh Bost and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ham v. Greenwell et al
as 1:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Willie Leroy Ham
Defendant:
Tommy Greenwell , Josh Bost , Kristin M. Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Ciesla v. C. Christian
as 16-2107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andrew Ciesla
Defendant - Appellee:
C. B. Christian, Trooper
Defendant:
D. McDaniel, Officer, Pemiscot County, Missouri and City of Hayti, Missouri
Daniel v. Pemiscot County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv00056
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dewayne Daniel
Defendant:
Pemiscot County Jail, John Doe, Chad Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Greenwell et al
as 1:2015cv00240
Plaintiff:
Michael Robinson
Defendant:
Pemiscot County Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troy Williams v. Fred Copeland, et al
as 15-1400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Troy Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
Fred W. Copeland, Judge and Pemiscot County Circuit Court
Hollywood v. Caruthersville Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2015cv00010
Plaintiff:
Ricky Hollywood
Defendant:
Caruthersville Sheriff's Department and Pemiscot County Justice Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tilson v. Pemiscot County Justice Detention Center et al
as 1:2014cv00189
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tilson
Defendant:
Pemiscot County Justice Detention Center and Caruthersville Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Pemiscot County, Missouri
as 1:2014cv00187
Plaintiff:
Crawford Benson
Defendant:
Pemiscot County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Copeland et al
as 1:2014cv00182
Plaintiff:
Troy Williams
Defendant:
Fred W. Copeland and Pemiscot County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
