Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 29
PETA v. Tri-State Zoological Park We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1010
Plaintiff / Appellee: PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS and PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC.
Defendant / Appellant: ROBERT CANDY, ANIMAL PARK, CARE & RESCUE, INC. and TRI-STATE ZOOLOGICAL PARK OF MARYLAND
Interested Party: MARYLAND ZOO
Candy et al v. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02335
Plaintiff: Animal Park, Care and Rescue, Inc., Tri-State Zoological Park of Western Maryland, Inc. and Robert L. Candy
Defendant: Colin Henstock, Delcianna Winders, Chris Fontes and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. et al v. The United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 2:2018cv00306
Plaintiff: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. and Delcianna J. Winders
Defendant: The United States Department of Agriculture and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Candy et al v. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01549
Plaintiff: Robert Candy , Animal Park, Care and Rescue, Inc. and Tri State Zoological Park of Western Maryland, Inc.
Defendant: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. , Brittany Peet, Holly Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Tri-State Zoological Park of Western Maryland, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02148
Plaintiff: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Defendant: Tri-State Zoological Park of Western Maryland, Inc., Animal Park, Care & Rescue, Inc. and Robert L. Candy
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531
PETA v. Joshua Stein We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1669
Plaintiff - Appellant: PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY and others
Defendant - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSHUA STEIN, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, CAROL L. FOLT, in her official capacity as Chancellor of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
PETA v. Joshua Stein
as 17-1669
Plaintiff / Appellant: PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC., ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS and others
Amicus Curiae: WTVD TELEVISION, LLC, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant / Appellee: CAROL L. FOLT, in her official capacity as Chancellor of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH STEIN, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina
PETA v. USDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2029
Plaintiff - Appellant: PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and THOMAS JAMES VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 5:2016cv00268
Plaintiff: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. , Animal Legal Defense Fund , Orca Network and others
Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture and Elizabeth Goldentyer
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC., ET AL. V STEIN, ET AL. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff: PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC. , ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND , CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY and others
Defendant: ROY COOPER and CAROL L. FOLT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?