Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ebrahimi v. Fields et al
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Shamim Ebrahimi
Defendant:
Michael R. Fields, Netflix, Inc., Electronic Arts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Burns v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Burns
Defendant:
Pepsico, LTD Plan and PepsiCo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carline v. PepsiCo, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00890
Plaintiff:
Demone Carline
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc. and Ace American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Gunter v. PepsiCo
as 3:2022cv01917
Plaintiff:
Timothy Gunter
Defendant:
PepsiCo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Parrish v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Thomas Parrish
Defendant:
Frito-Lay North America, Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Green v. PepsiCo, Inc
as 3:2021cv00450
Plaintiff:
Timothy Green
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc and PepsiCo, Inc doing business as Pepsi Beverages Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
