Cases 31 - 40 of 1,166
Clay v. Noradin, et al
as 1:2023cv16799
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Clay
Defendant:
Anthony F. Noradin, Samuel J. Cirone, William Brogan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
EDMOND v. WEXFORD HEALTH et al
as 1:2023cv02144
Plaintiff:
JAMARR EDMOND
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH, NOE MARANDET, K. MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvin Perez v. Quinton Perrigen
as 23-3248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRVIN PEREZ, also known as IRVIN H. PEREZ, also known as IRVIN PEREZ H.
Defendant / Appellee:
QUINTON PERRIGEN, Correctional Officer
Jesse Perez v. Mohammed Siddiqui
as 23-3208
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE R. PEREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI, Medical Director, Wexford
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gonzalez-Nunez v. Malone et al
as 2:2023cv01503
Plaintiff:
Antonia M Gonzalez-Nunez
Defendant:
Jamine Malone and Teresa Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zarate-Hernandez v. Maldonaldo et al
as 4:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
LUIS ZARATE-HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
LUIS PEREZ MALDONALDO, BARR-NUNN TRANSPORTATION, LLC, Luis Perez Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Juana Alonzo-Perez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3146
Petitioner:
JUANA ALONZO-PEREZ and JUANA ALONZO-ALONZO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Stewart v. Szul et al
as 1:2023cv15969
Plaintiff:
Wynton P. Steward and Wynton P Stewart
Defendant:
R. Szul, G. Perez 03, C. Deanes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
