Cases 1 - 10 of 180
Perez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
Rodrigo Cruz Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Perez v. Reagle
as 5:2024cv00083
Petitioner:
Oscar Perez
Respondent:
Christina Reagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
COLEMAN v. MAUNEY et al
as 1:2023cv01127
Plaintiff:
DEANNA COLEMAN and AUGUSTINE PEREZ
Defendant:
CHASE MAUNEY, SHERIFF SAMUEL SCOTT PAGE, ADAM D MOSQUEDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Murphy v. Aramark Food Service and Facilities Management, East Carolina University et al
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Larry F. Murphy
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service and Facilities Management, East Carolina University, ARAMARK Campus, LLC, Kelvin Tarakwasha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Vail-Perez v. USA
as 5:2023cv00545
Petitioner:
Mynor Romeo Vail-Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
