Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Pernal v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
as 1:2026cv00728
Plaintiff:
Michael Pernal
Defendant:
UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Mullady et al v Office of Management and Budget
as 8:2026cv00573
Plaintiff:
Doreen Mullady, Hilary Ingraham, Kimberly Anne Gudenkauf and others
Defendant:
Office of Management and Budget, Russell Vought, Office of Personnel Management and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Simpson v. Bodiford
as 6:2025cv06474
Plaintiff:
Dellutri Simpson and Dellutri Pernal Simpson
Defendant:
Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ballard (PS) v. Schultz et al
as 1:2024cv03059
Defendant:
Mick Bunn, Darin Little, Mia Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Ballard and Jacqueline-Sue Ballard
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Simpson v. Pierce
as 6:2024cv04502
Plaintiff:
Dellutri Pernal Simpson
Defendant:
Joshua R Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Syville v. City of New York
as 22-3041
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alphonso Syville
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Paul Hargrow and Smila Kodali
Defendant:
A. Brown, Pernal, Ms. Robinson and others
Pernal et al v. Proflame Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04526
Plaintiff:
Peter Pernal, Ryan Gordon, Robert Ely and others
Defendant:
Proflame Inc., John Humphry, Amelia A Humphry and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pernal v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv00192
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Dynax Corporation, Chemours Company, The and others
Plaintiff:
Mike Pernal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Syville v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv04633
Defendant:
City of New York, A. Brown, Ms. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Syville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
