Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Wallace et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00516
Plaintiff:
Eric Wallace, Fred Patmon, Timothy Robinson and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Nathan Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Lumpkin
as 21-10761
Petitioner / Appellant:
Pervis Lee Andrews, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Toles v. Richardson
as 3:2021cv00282
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Pervis Toles
Defendant:
Officer Richardson and Travis Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toles v. Fair
as 5:2021cv00040
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Pervis Toles
Defendant:
Lt. Fair and Darrick Fair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv00547
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and State of Texas
Petitioner:
Pervis Lee Andrews, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bertrand et al v. Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C
as 6:2018cv01391
Plaintiff:
Pervis Bertrand and Mary Bertrand
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C and Wal-Mart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pervis v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2018cv00095
Petitioner:
Wendell L Pervis
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Sonny Pervi
as 17-20689
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SONNY FLOYD PERVIS
Gilbert v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2017cv00299
Plaintiff:
Gerald E. Gilbert
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Brad Livingston, James W. Mossbarger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hebert v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2013cv03142
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pervis Hebert
Defendant:
U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
