Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Daniel v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02705
Plaintiff:
Peter Daniel
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DUNPHY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13742
Plaintiff:
PETER DANIEL DUNPHY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perez v. Lower Buckeye Jail
as 2:2021cv00371
Defendant:
Lower Buckeye Jail and Unknown Bello
Plaintiff:
Peter Daniel Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00712
Plaintiff:
Vincent Peter Daniels and Vincent Daniels
Defendant:
Commi. of Soc. Sec. Andrew M. Saul and Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MICHAUD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv04471
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PETER DANIEL MICHAUD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colussi v. Saul
as 1:2020cv02383
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Peter Daniel Colussi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sims v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv04618
Plaintiff:
Ardamis Darrell Sims
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, John Raba, Peter Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims et al v. Cook County Illinois et al
as 1:2016cv10767
Plaintiff:
Ardamis Darrell Sims, Burundi Antonio Martin, Larry D Woods and others
Defendant:
Cook County Illinois, Thomas Dart, Toni Preckwinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In the Matter of the Complaint of God's Mercy, LLC, as Owner of the F/V GOD'S MERCY
as 2:2011cv00426
Plaintiff:
In the Matter of the Complaint of God's Mercy, LLC, as Owner of the F/V GOD'S MERCY
Claimant:
Peter Daniel Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Ivan Matthews v. Susan Fisher, et al
as 10-15717
Petitioner - Appellant:
IVAN LEE MATTHEWS
Respondent - Appellee:
SUSAN FISHER, ROBERT HARMAN, PETER DANIELS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
