Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Paul Navarrete Quintana v. Cynthia E. Lermond, Psy, D. et al
as 5:2023cv01522
Plaintiff:
Paul Navarrete Quintana
Defendant:
Cynthia E. Lermond, Psy, D., Nicole Paglione, Psy, D., Melinda Wolbransky, Psy, D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Bjorn Haapaniemi
as 23-35205
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BJORN ERIK HAAPANIEMI, AKA Peter Lee Norris, AKA Peter Lee Bjorn Norris
Moseley v. Kendall et al
as 2:2022cv02715
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Moseley
Defendant:
Brian Kendall, Timothy Clark, Peter Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Norris
as 3:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Peter Lee Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Haapaniemi v. Warden Hijar
as 3:2021cv00309
Petitioner:
Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi and Peter Lee Norris
Respondent:
Warden Hijar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Norris v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2021cv00267
Plaintiff:
Peter Lee Norris and Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Norris v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2021cv00292
Plaintiff:
Peter Lee Norris and Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Haapaniemi v. Warden Hijar
as 3:2021cv00291
Petitioner:
Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi and Peter Lee Norris
Respondent:
Warden Hijar and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Norris v. Ms. Hjar et al
as 3:2021cv00280
Plaintiff:
Peter Lee Norris and Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi
Defendant:
Ms. Hjar and Director, et. al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haapaniemi v. Priddle et al
as 3:2021cv00243
Plaintiff:
Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi and Peter Lee Norris
Defendant:
Steven J. Priddle, Jonas M. Walker, Randall S. Cavanaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
