Cases 1 - 10 of 32
RUSSELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20847
Plaintiff:
PETER RUSSELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Robert Russell
as 23-6209
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT PETER RUSSELL
Fredrick Herold, Jr. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc
as 22-2235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDRICK W. HEROLD, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INCORPORATED, BRADFORD E. BUGHER, KRISTINA HEROLD and others
US v. Robert Russell
as 22-7060
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT PETER RUSSELL
US v. Robert Russell
as 22-6804
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT PETER RUSSELL
FTF Lending LLC v. 614 East 7th Street LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10768
Plaintiff:
FTF Lending LLC
Cross Defendant:
614 East 7th Street LLC
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Thomas F Meade, IV
Defendant:
Collector-Treasurer, City of Boston, Peter Russell, John Does 1-10 and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Andrew J Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
US v. Robert Russell
as 21-7765
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT PETER RUSSELL
Russell v. Bed Bath & Beyond Inc
as 3:2021cv02480
Plaintiff:
Peter Russell
Defendant:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosado, et al v. Maxymillian et al
as 20-3965
Plaintiff:
Ryan Przesiek, John Suggs, Raymond Lagree and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Terri Maxymillian, Sex Offender Treatment Program Director, Peter Russell, Acting Executive Director of CNYPC, FKA Maureen Bosco, Jeff Nowicki, Sex Offender Treatment Program Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Rosado
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
