Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 182
Stephenson v. Davis
as 24-414
Plaintiff: JOSEPH STEPHENSON, (Class of One, Pro-se Petitioner)
Defendant: CARLENE DAVIS, (D.O.C. Counselor Supervisor), ANGEL QUIROS, (Commissioner-Conn. Dept of Correction, BARONE, (Warden, MacDougall State Prison) and others
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER v. USA/HHS
as 1:2024cv10000
Plaintiff: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER
Defendant: USA/HHS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Hemsley v. Hawk, et al.
as 23-3035
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD DAVID HEMSLEY, One of we the people, Petitioner, Sui Juris, a living soul, created by God, a self governed individual, an ambassador of Christ, having taken dominion over Juris of the Land, Air, Water, this LAW and Richard of the House of Hemsley
Defendant / Appellee: JEFFERY A. HAWK, as Judge, BRUCE A. LARSON, as Judge, WOODROW PENGELLY, as prosecutor and others
Bradley v. Bradley et al
as 3:2023cv00199
Plaintiff: Jermaine Bradley
Defendant: Officer J. Bradley, Prosecutor Joseph B Myers, Judge Jason B Thompson and others
Robert Graves v. USDC-ORPEN
as 23-70171
Not Classified By Court: In re: ROBERT EUGENE GRAVES, DAVID ANTHONY COLAGE and HEIDI STEWARD, Acting Director of the Oregon Department of Corrections, State of Oregon, having sole custody of the Petitioner
Petitioner: ROBERT EUGENE GRAVES
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PENDLETON
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER v. USA/HHS
as 1:2023cv10000
Plaintiff: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER
Defendant: USA/HHS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
In Re: In the Matter of the Application of Lufthansa Technik AG, Petitioner, for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022mc00034
In Re: In the Matter of the Application of Lufthansa Technik AG, Petitioner, for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782
Petitioner: Lufthansa Technik AG
Respondent: Thales Avionics, Inc.
Intervenor: Astronics Advanced Electronic Systems Corp.
In Re: In the Matter of the Application of Lufthansa Technik AG, Petitioner, for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782
as 8:2022cv02336
Petitioner: Lufthansa Technik AG
Respondent: Thales Avionics, Inc.
In Re: In the Matter of the Application of Lufthansa Technik AG, Petitioner, for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782
Stuart Shicks v. Indiana Department of Child Services, et al
as 22-3297
Plaintiff / Appellant: STUART J. SHICKS
Defendant / Appellee: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES, of Allen County, KIMBERLY C. HERZOG, Family Case Manager, AFRIKA DAVIS, Supervisor and others
BEESLEY'S POINT SEA-DOO, INC.
as 1:2022cv07213
Counter Defendant: Petitioner BEESLEY'S POINT SEA-DOO, INC.
Counter Claimant: Matthew Sandman
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0185 PETITION FOR LIMITATION LIABILITY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?