Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Phelps v. Thomas et al
as 7:2014cv00217
Petitioner:
Lloyd B Phelps
Respondent:
Willie Thomas and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America et al v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America et al
as 1:2014cv00012
Plaintiff:
United States of America, f/u/b/o Beeler Barney & Associates Masonry Contractors, Inc. and Beeler Barney & Associates Masonry Contractors, Inc.
Defendant:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and Hensel Phelps Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Phelps v. Thomas et al
as 7:2013cv02275
Petitioner:
Lloyd B. Phelps
Respondent:
Willie Thomas and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Phelps et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00512
Plaintiff:
Walter Earl Williams
Defendant:
Nurse Phelps and Staton Infirmary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Nearer et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00417
Plaintiff:
David Boy Fuller
Defendant:
Lt. Nearer , Sgt. Talley , Officer Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Davenport et al
as 5:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Phelps
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phelps v. Continental Automotive Systems
as 5:2012cv00692
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ray Phelps
Defendant:
Continental Automotive Systems
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. Thomas
as 1:2012cv00028
Petitioner:
Lloyd Burnell Phelps
Respondent:
Willie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Phelps v. Campbell
as 1:2011cv00454
Plaintiff:
Lloyd B. Phelps
Defendant:
Jody Wise Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
