Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Watkins v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Jessie James Watkins
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan, Harris and Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crafton v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Crafton
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, John Q. Hamm, Wendy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Morgan et al
as 2:2023cv01712
Plaintiff:
Elijah Deshawn Robinson
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan, Vencini Smith, L Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv01618
Plaintiff:
De'Vontay Jones
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Vencini Smith, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Givens et al
as 2:2023cv01611
Plaintiff:
Ocie Lee Lynch
Defendant:
Warden G. Givens, Warden Vencini Smith and Warden Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Morgan
as 5:2023cv01473
Petitioner:
Jessie James Watkins
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smelley v. Morgan
as 2:2023cv01419
Plaintiff:
Lionel Matizie Smelley
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glasscock v. Current Commissioner ADOC et al
as 2:2023cv01394
Plaintiff:
Morris Glasscock
Defendant:
Current Commissioner ADOC, Jo Woods, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Southard v. Hogg et al
as 2:2023cv01385
Plaintiff:
Kenny Southard
Defendant:
John Hogg, Jo Woods, Ebony Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. McKenzie et al
as 2:2023cv01357
Plaintiff:
Lionel Russell
Defendant:
Brandon McKenzie and Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
