Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Watkins v. Morgan
as 5:2023cv01473
Petitioner: Jessie James Watkins
Respondent: Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smelley v. Morgan
as 2:2023cv01419
Plaintiff: Lionel Matizie Smelley
Defendant: Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glasscock v. Current Commissioner ADOC et al
as 2:2023cv01394
Plaintiff: Morris Glasscock
Defendant: Current Commissioner ADOC, Jo Woods, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Southard v. Hogg et al
as 2:2023cv01385
Plaintiff: Kenny Southard
Defendant: John Hogg, Jo Woods, Ebony Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. McKenzie et al
as 2:2023cv01357
Plaintiff: Lionel Russell
Defendant: Brandon McKenzie and Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodson v. Morgan (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00585
Plaintiff: Ronald Andre Goodson
Defendant: Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Morgan (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00560
Plaintiff: Mitchell Bernard Johnson
Defendant: Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00551
Plaintiff: De'Vontay Jones
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections, Vencini Smith, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Morgan
as 1:2023cv00358
Petitioner: Paul Eugene Bailey
Respondent: Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carmichael v. Morgan et al
as 2:2023cv01154
Plaintiff: Roderick Carmichael
Defendant: Phyllis Morgan, John Hamm and Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?