Cases 1 - 10 of 169
Kuriatnyk v. Piper et al
as 6:2024cv06196
Plaintiff:
Steven Kuriatnyk
Defendant:
Christopher Piper, Samantha Simonetti, David Blaho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gaboriault v. Primmer Piper Eggleston & Cramer, P.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Shawna Gaboriault
Defendant:
Primmer, Piper, Eggleston & Cramer, P.C. and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Murphy v. Piper et al
as 7:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Adam E. Murphy
Defendant:
Correctin Officer Piper, Orange County Sheriffs Office and Orange County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plymouth County Retirement Association v. Array Technologies, Inc.
as 23-1122
Plaintiff:
Julian Keippel
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plymouth County Retirement Association, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for Northern California
Defendant / Appellee:
Array Technologies, Inc., Jim Fusaro, Nipul Patel and others
Link Motion Inc. v. DLA Piper LLP (US)
as 23-944
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Link Motion Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
DLA Piper LLP (US) and Caryn G. Schechtman
Mehta v. DLA Piper LLP
as 1:2023cv04757
Plaintiff:
Anisha Mehta
Defendant:
DLA Piper LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm Fed. Question: Family and Medical Leave Act
Metrom Rail, LLC v. Siemens Mobility, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03057
Plaintiff:
Metrom Rail, LLC
Defendant:
Siemens Mobility, Inc., Ground Transportation Systems USA Inc., Thales USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Metrom Rail, LLC v. Ground Transportation Systems USA Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02920
Plaintiff:
Metrom Rail, LLC
Defendant:
Ground Transportation Systems USA Inc. and Piper Networks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sharma v. Rent the Runway, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06935
Plaintiff:
Rajat Sharma
Defendant:
Rent the Runway, Inc., Jennifer Y. Hyman, Scarlett O'Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Woldanski v. TuSimple Holdings, Inc. et al.
as 1:2022cv09625
Plaintiff:
PATRICK WOLDANSKI
Defendant:
TUSIMPLE HOLDINGS, INC., CHENG LU, PATRICK DILLON and others
Petitioner:
George Maurizi, Guy Donald Foulkes, Ronald Betsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
