Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Pittman v. United States
as 3:2023cv02281
Petitioner:
Steven Pittman, Jr.
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pittman #364680 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Edward Peblo Pittman #364680
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Bowne, C. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester Bell v. MI, et al
as 22-1962
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESTER BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
INSPECTOR DALE BONN, SERGEANT MARIO CUNNINGHAM, SERGEANT JACKSON and others
Darnell Pittman v. USA
as 22-3742
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARNELL PITTMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Marcus Polk v. Tony Parker, et al
as 22-5506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS D. POLK
Defendant / Appellee:
TONY PARKER, TDOC Commissioner, in his individual capacity, RUBENARD RISPER, Chief of Security at Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex, in his individual and official capacity, YOLANDA PITTMAN, Associate Warden, in her individual and official capacity and others
Brown #126854 v. Young et al
as 1:2022cv00486
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Brown #126854
Defendant:
Coleman Young, Donald Douggain, Wayne, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Witt v. Saint Joseph Health System, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00102
Executor:
Samara Witt
Defendant:
Saint Joseph Health System, Inc., Commonspirit Health, Inc., Ofc. Logan Medlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Gomez
as 6:2021cv00117
Petitioner:
Darnell Pittman, Sr.
Respondent:
Christopher Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hart v. Brown et al
as 1:2021cv01030
Defendant:
JUDY WIGGINS, Leonard Brown, Trina Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Deanthony Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. USA
as 1:2020cv01071
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Darnell Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
