Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pittman v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al
as 4:2023cv01447
Plaintiff:
Randy Dewayne Pittman
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. and Visa USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Pittman v. United States Department of Justice
as 2:2023cv01090
Plaintiff:
Randy D Pittman
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
Randy D Pittman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Hugghins (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
James Earl Pittman, Jr.
Defendant:
Thomas Hugghins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyson v. Pittman
as 1:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Eriane Dyson
Defendant:
Erico Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Removal of Civil/Criminal Action from State Court
Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company v. Taylor Burton Co Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Taylor Burton Co Inc, Blake Pittman, Ryan Goolsby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Pittman v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00564
Plaintiff:
James E. Pittman, Jr.
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins, Keith Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Georgia, State of et al
as 2:2021cv00785
Defendant:
Lenn Wood, Georgia, State of, Jonathan W Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Dewayne Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. GoDaddy Media Temple LLC
as 2:2021cv00784
Defendant:
GoDaddy Media Temple LLC
Plaintiff:
Randy Dewayne Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
