Cases 31 - 40 of 105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Howell v. Planet Fitness et al
as 1:2022cv11025
Plaintiff:
Curtis Howell
Defendant:
Planet Fitness, Boston Police Department, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jean-Pierre Ronet v. Heston Silbert, et al
as 22-15942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEAN-PIERRE RONET
Defendant / Appellee:
HESTON SILBERT, Director, STEPHEN MORRISON, Administrative Service Manager, Arizona Department of Public Safety, in his official and individual capacity, DANIEL KILEY, Judge-Superior Court and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Planet Fitness International Franchise v. JEG-United, LLC
as 1:2022mc00011
Plaintiff:
Planet Fitness International Franchise
Defendant:
JEG-United, LLC
Petitioner:
Carlos Ibarra
3Rd Party Defendant:
Raymond Miolla
PLANET FITNESS INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE v. JEG-UNITED, LLC
as 1:2022mc20808
Plaintiff:
PLANET FITNESS INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE
Defendant:
JEG-UNITED, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
RAYMOND MIOLLA
PLANET FITNESS INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE v. JEG-UNITED, LLC
as 1:2022cv20810
Plaintiff:
PLANET FITNESS INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE
Defendant:
JEG-UNITED, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
RAYMOND MIOLLA
Planet Fitness International Franchise v. JEG-United, LLC
as 1:2022mc20811
Plaintiff:
PLANET FITNESS INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE
Defendant:
JEG-UNITED, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
RAYMOND MIOLLA
PLANET FITNESS INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE v. JEG-UNITED, LLC
as 1:2022mc20807
Plaintiff:
PLANET FITNESS INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE
Defendant:
JEG-UNITED, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
RAYMOND MIOLLA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
