Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Poe v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02687
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Poe
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Poe et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00561
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Angel Poe and Andrew Poe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poe et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 1:2020dp20094
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Poe and Curtis Poe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poe v. Utica Village of et al
as 2:2019cv04917
Plaintiff:
Gerald Dwayne Poe
Defendant:
Cameron Dailey, Utica Village of and Nicholas Potter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. Actavis LLC et al
as 1:2018op46327
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Erin Doyle, Stephanie Howell, Michelle Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Wiser v. Fresh Promise Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00231
Plaintiff:
David G. Wiser
Defendant:
Fresh Promise Foods, Inc. and Joseph E. Poe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Jennings v. Webster County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv02930
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Jennings
Defendant:
Webster County Jail, Terry Elders, Mary Poe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. City of Kent, Ohio, et al
as 5:2016cv01347
Defendant:
City of Kent, Ohio, Kent Ohio Police Department, Michelle A. Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
