Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Dennis v. Wilmouth et al
as 6:2023cv00051
Petitioner:
James Gardner Dennis
Respondent:
Lori Wilmouth, Kelly Poe and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blake v. Holloway et al
as 7:2023cv00381
Plaintiff:
Isaw Waleed Blake
Defendant:
Mr. Holloway, Mr. Harold W. Clarke, Mss. E. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ennis v. Poe et al
as 5:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Ian Ennis
Defendant:
Deputy Tyler Poe and Deputy Zachary Fadley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gulbranson v. Virginia Dept. of Corrections, Lawrenceville Corr. Center et al
as 1:2020cv00900
Petitioner:
Robert Murray Gulbranson and Dexter Poe
Respondent:
Virginia Dept. of Corrections, Lawrenceville Corr. Center and Michael Bracken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00247
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cola, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2020cv00034
Plaintiff:
Lillian Gay, Shirley Thomas, Terry Johnson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Cola, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2020cv00210
Plaintiff:
Lillian Gay, Shirley Thomas, Terry Johnson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Rahbar v. Law Office of Arquilla & Poe, PLC et al
as 1:2018cv01475
Defendant:
Law Office of Arquilla & Poe, PLC and Michael L. Poe, Esq.
Plaintiff:
Michelle Rahbar and Michelle Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poe v. United States Of America
as 3:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Bettina M. Poe
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Pickrell, III v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail et al
as 1:2015cv00657
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Pickrell, III
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Jail, City of Portsmouth, Va., NaphCare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
