Cases 1 - 10 of 23
David Lack v. Posner, et al
as 23-55522
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LACK and DAVID JAMES LACK
Defendant / Appellee:
POSNER, Dr; CTF Soledad Prison Chief Medical Officer, BRIAN COTA, DDA, CRAIG KOENIG, Acting Warden, CTF Soledad Warden and others
David Lack v. Dr. Posner et al
as 2:2022cv02955
Plaintiff:
David Lack
Defendant:
Dr. Posner, Brian Cota, Craig Koenig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKS v. HORN, et al
as 2:2018cv00312
Defendant:
DANIEL A MANION, GREGORY HORN, DIANE P. WOOD and others
Plaintiff:
WARREN PARKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Horn
as 1:2018cv00451
Defendant:
Daniel A Manion, Gregory Horn, Richard Posner and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pons v. Bates et al
as 3:2018cv00322
Plaintiff:
Pablo A. Pons, II
Defendant:
James D. Bates, Melvin Resnick, Dexter L. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Kernan et al
as 3:2016cv02339
Plaintiff:
Mauro Padilla
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, Raymond Madden, Armando Favila and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Miller et al
as 3:2016cv01686
Plaintiff:
William Garcia
Defendant:
Amy Miller, L. Caldaron, R. Arias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faulkner, Jr. v. Phillips et al
as 3:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Faulkner, Jr.
Defendant:
Ken Phillips, Posner, M. Farias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Tulsa Welding School, et al
as 14-5093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY N. TAYLOR, Sheriff
Defendant - Appellee:
TULSA WELDING SCHOOL, UNIVERSITY OF TULSA HOSPITAL, WINNEBAGO COUNTY STATES ATTORNEY and others
Taylor v. Tulsa Welding School et al
as 4:2014cv00321
Plaintiff:
Terry N Taylor
Defendant:
Tulsa Welding School, University of Tulsa Hospital, Winnebago County States Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
