Cases 1 - 10 of 492
Kauffman v. 800 Pound Gorilla Media, LLC
as 3:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
David Kauffman
Defendant:
800 Pound Gorilla Media, LLC
Ford v. Pound
as 3:2024cv00151
Petitioner:
Micah Joshua Ford and Joseph I Tolbert
Respondent:
Zach Pound
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caldwell v. Pounds et al
as 3:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Torrey Caldwell
Defendant:
Zachary Pounds, Frank Strada, Linda Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Hoops Corporation et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv20882
Plaintiff:
Hoops Corporation and Angela Di Porzio
Defendant:
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU, Attorney General MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Pounds v. Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Phillis Pounds
Defendant:
Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC and Dollar Tree Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dj Fed. Question: Declaratory Judgment
Stanley v. Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Stanley, Thomas Neeley, Dominick Garland and others
Defendant:
Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC, Dollar Tree Inc. doing business as Dollar Tree and Family Dollar, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Anthony LacyIn re: Anthony Lacy
as 24-5143
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY JOSEPH LACY
Respondent:
ZAC POUNDS
Lacy v. Pounds
as 2:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Anthony Lacy
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dotson v. Pounds
as 2:2024cv02053
Petitioner:
Jessie Dotson
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
