Cases 1 - 10 of 63
CHESTNUT v. ACP/467 et al
as 2:2024cv01674
Plaintiff:
TARA CHESTNUT
Defendant:
ACP/467, CHIDIALDI EZENGWU, CHANELL PRATER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prater v. SA Piper Logistics
as 4:2023cv01411
Plaintiff:
David Prater
Defendant:
SA Piper Logistics
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
MILLER-BELL v. HALL et al
as 2:2023cv00924
Plaintiff:
CHERYL ANN MILLER-BELL
Defendant:
SARA HALL, REVEREND MICHAEL GESTRICH, SHAWNA WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TODD v. RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE et al
as 2:2022cv04777
Plaintiff:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant:
RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE, Not Named Graham Estate, CHRISTINE RIDLEY ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PRATER et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMP. et al
as 2:2020cv01200
Defendant:
GREGORY MILLS, DANA MILLS, MIDAS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER, "JOHN DOE" DECEASED, "JANE DOE" MINOR CHILD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHILA LICENSE AND INSPECTION et al v. PRATER et al
as 2:2020cv01035
Defendant:
CHIDIADI D EZENGWA, CHARMAINE PRATER and JUAN REYES
Plaintiff:
BBS and PHILA LICENSE AND INSPECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PRATER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv00074
Defendant:
SUPERVISOR S. DOUGHERTY, CARLEEN WYTCHE, ANTHONY DISABATO and others
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATER v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2019cv00019
Defendant:
PEGGY BARNS, DAVID CLOSE, REBECCA REIFER and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PRATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PRATER v. AMERICAN HERITAGE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 2:2018cv05515
Defendant:
JANE DOE, MATTHEW JAMES, JOH DOE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
PRATER v. FRYE et al
as 2:2018cv01774
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
Defendant:
FRYE, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
