Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Smith v. NetSpend Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Prentis Earl Smith, II
Defendant:
NetSpend Corporation and Netspend Legal Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brown v. Perfect Freight et al
as 4:2023cv03178
Plaintiff:
Prentis Brown
Defendant:
Perfect Freight and Leonardo Silva Barroso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Smith v. Marion County
as 23-40151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Prentis Earl Smith, II
Defendant / Appellee:
Marion County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff David McKnight, Jefferson Police Department and others
Gammage v. Jindal Tubular USA, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Prentis Gammage
Defendant:
Jindal Tubular USA, LLC and Express Services, Inc. doing business as Express Employment Professionals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith, II v. Marion County Jail et al
as 4:2019cv00719
Plaintiff:
Prentis Earl Smith, II
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff's Office, Marion County Jail and Marion County District Clerk's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin et al v. Guaranty Bank and Trust Company
as 3:2019cv00102
Plaintiff:
Prentis W. Goodwin and Kim A. Goodwin
Defendant:
Guaranty Bank and Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Marion County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2018cv00345
Plaintiff:
Prentis Earl Smith, II
Defendant:
Jefferson Police Department, Sheriff David McKnight, Marion County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prentis v. CBOCS Texas LLC
as 4:2015cv00157
Defendant:
CBOCS Texas LLC
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Prentis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cortez v. United States of America
as 7:2014cv00970
Plaintiff:
America Cortez
Defendant:
United States of America and Stephen Prentis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-30985
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
