Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gabriel Pittman v. President Donald J. Trump, et al
as 20-1961
Defendant / Appellee:
PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, C.O. BRADLEY HERRON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GABRIEL PITTMAN
WASHINGTON v. TRUMP
as 2:2020cv00062
Defendant:
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
PRESIDENT GEORGE WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS V. TRUMP, et al
as 2:2019cv04677
Respondent:
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR, GOV. TOM WOLF and others
Petitioner:
DOREL JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gabriel Pittman v. American Correctional Associat, et al
as 19-1141
Defendant:
PADOC SECRETARY JOHN A. WETZEL, in his Individual, Official and Corporate Capacities, PA SECRETARY OF TREASURY TIMOTHY K. REESE, in his Individual, Official and Corporate Capacities, CORRECTIONAL CABLE TELEVISION CORP INC, in its Individual, Official and Corporate Capacities and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCI-HOUTZDALE MAILROOM SUPERVISOR GAILEY, In his Individual, Official and Corporate Capacities, PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, in his Individual, Official and Corporate Capacities, U.S. SECRETARY OF TREASURY STEVEN MNUCHIN, in his Individual, Offical and Corporate Capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GABRIEL PITTMAN
CATERBONE v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 5:2018cv02710
Defendant:
MIKE GEESEY, ABIGAL PFLUMM, ASHLEY BLAKE and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PITTMAN v. PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP et al
as 3:2017cv00163
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL PITTMAN
Defendant:
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFF SESSIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabriel Pittman v. Donald Trump, et al
as 17-2252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GABRIEL PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, US ATTORNEY GENERAL JEFF SESSIONS, AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
