Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Gantt v. Hughes, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00701
Plaintiff:
Carlos R. Gantt
Defendant:
Preston Hughes and Dennis Meeks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Meeks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00679
Plaintiff:
Dagoberto Quiroz Gonzalez
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks and Preston Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Del Toro v. Meeks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00648
Plaintiff:
Raul Mariano Del Toro
Defendant:
Roger Powell, Dennis Meeks and Preston Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yelverton v. Meeks et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00394
Plaintiff:
Freddie L. Yelverton
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks, Preston Hughes, Southern Health Partners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradham v. Meeks et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00348
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Bradham
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks, Preston Hughes, Keith Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edgar v. Meeks et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00289
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Edgar
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks, Preston Hughes, Southern Health Partners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Covington County Jail et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2011cv00209
Plaintiff:
Carl Edward Miller
Defendant:
Preston Hughes , Dennis Meeks , Southern Health Partners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Meeks et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00199
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Williams
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks , Preston Hughes , Dr. McWohlters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbaree v. Meeks et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2010cv01073
Plaintiff:
Michael Dayle Barbaree
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks and Preston Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Capers v. Southern Health Partners et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00407
Plaintiff:
Curtis Eugene Capers
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Dr. McWolters, Linda Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
