Cases 1 - 10 of 369
Birdsong v. McGarvey et al
as 3:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Cornisha S. Birdsong
Defendant:
Lee M. McGarvey and New Prime, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Giles et al v. Ulysse et al
as 7:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Machelle Burton Giles and Bonita Washington
Defendant:
Berlanda C Ulysse and New Prime Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cal Prime, Inc. v. Sika AG et al
as 2:2024at00376
Plaintiff:
Cal Prime, Inc.
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Cal Prime, Inc. v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Cal Prime, Inc.
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Asante v. Roberts et al
as 1:2024cv01936
Plaintiff:
Bernard L Asante
Defendant:
John M. Roberts and New Prime Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Gilmore v. Legros et al
as 2:2024cv02057
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Deidre Gilmore
Defendant:
Ronald Legros and New Prime Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
New Prime, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company
as 23-3524
Plaintiff / Appellee:
New Prime, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant:
Federal Insurance Company
Rye v. Durocher et al
as 3:2023cv01178
Plaintiff:
Edward Edwin Rye
Defendant:
Durocher Dorestant, New Prime, Inc. and Dorestant Durocher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Bang et al v. New Prime, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01428
Plaintiff:
Young Tae Bang and Eun Ha Joo
Defendant:
New Prime, Inc. and Jesus Elias Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Doe C.L. v. New Prime, Inc.
as 6:2023cv03278
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and C.L.
Defendant:
New Prime, Inc. doing business as Prime, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
