Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Anderson v. Greenville County Detention Center et al
as 8:2015cv04219
Petitioner:
Rufus Julius C Anderson
Respondent:
Greenville County Detention Center and South Carolina Probation and Parole Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-7311
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-7311
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00332
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv02556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Butcher v. North Carolina Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 5:2015ct03071
Plaintiff:
Horace Edward Butcher, III
Defendant:
North Carolina Board of Probation and Parole, Sue Anne Long and Investigator Zimmerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon Staton v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 15-6011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GORDON SCOTT STATON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, UVA POLICE DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT 9 PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Outlaw v. Martin County, NC et al
as 5:2014ct03316
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Outlaw, Sr.
Defendant:
Martin County, NC, Martin County Probation and Parole and Patrese Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billy Adams v. Chadwick Phillip
as 14-7829
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY CARL ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHADWICK PHILLIPS, T. Probation and Parole, District 28, DOUGLAS A. IRVING, Supervisor District 28, Radford, VA, MELISSA DANCY HENDERSON, Probation and Parole, District 16 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
