Cases 31 - 40 of 121
Hasan v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 1:2021cv00971
Plaintiff:
Denny Hasan
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Department of Corrections Probation and Parole and Sharon Purifoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2021cv00961
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, City of Kenosha, Kenosha Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. LaPorte County of et al
as 3:2021cv00360
Plaintiff:
Robert Omar Pratt, Jr and Rev. Robert Pratt, Jr
Defendant:
Robert Hagler, Holt, Allen W Ott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Probation and Parole Board
as 3:2021cv00005
Petitioner:
WIllie James Smith
Respondent:
Probation and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
May v. City of Kenosha et al
as 2:2020cv01721
Defendant:
PO Morenz, Detective Weinke, Kenosha Police Officers and Detectives and others
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boutte' v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00328
Defendant:
Aramark, Miami Correctional Facility, Judges and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Scott Boutte'
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benner v. Indiana Attorney General
as 3:2020cv00731
Petitioner:
Mark Benner
Respondent:
Indiana Attorney General and Probation Officer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Strouse v. Warden et al
as 3:2020cv00834
Respondent:
Warden and U.S. Probation
Petitioner:
James Strouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. United States Department of State et al
as 3:2020cv50214
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Administrative Offices of the Courts, United States Department of State and others
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00829
Defendant:
Buchanan, Chief of Police, P and P Supervisors and others
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
