Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Cofield et al v. The Progressive Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01370
Plaintiff:
Dr. Keenan Cofield, Laverne Thompson and Kayla Nedd
Defendant:
The Progressive Corporation, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Progressive Direct Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 es
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv02602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Avent v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2019cv10907
Plaintiff:
Reuben Avent
Defendant:
Danielle Barror, Unknown Company Representatives, Steven Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray Smith, et al v. Patrick McPharlin, et al
as 19-1795
Plaintiff:
RUSH HOLMES, BARRET KISH, AMERICANS FOR REFORM and others
Defendant:
TRANSAMERICA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, PATRICK M. MCPHARLIN, Director of Insurance and Financial Services, AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAY SMITH
Smith et al v. McPharlin et al
as 2:2017cv13392
Plaintiff:
Rush Holmes, Barret Kish, Americans for Reform and others
Defendant:
Patrick M. McPharlin, The Hanover Insurance Company, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
