Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Lea v. Sims et al
as 6:2019cv06044
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lea
Defendant:
Judge Barry Sims and Prosecutor Kim Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Arnold et al
as 6:2019cv06046
Defendant:
Judge Gary Arnold and Deputy Prosecutor Brian Clary
Plaintiff:
Larry Parker, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Jegley et al
as 4:2019cv00238
Defendant:
Mireille Delbecq, Does 1-2, Designee/proxy, Pulaski County Prosecutor's Office, M Swagerty and others
Plaintiff:
Arron Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marvel v. Barham et al
as 2:2018cv02213
Defendant:
Scott County Prosecutors Office, Public Defender Aubrey Barr, Deputy P. A. Tyler Barham and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dale Marvel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winchester v. 20th Judicial District Prosecutors Office et al
as 4:2017cv00504
Plaintiff:
Mark A Winchester, Sr
Defendant:
20th Judicial District Prosecutors Office and Cody Hiland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Derrick et al
as 5:2017cv05137
Plaintiff:
James Ryan Rodgers
Defendant:
Derrick, Leroy Froman, James Pate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Hot Springs Police Department et al
as 6:2016cv06062
Plaintiff:
Myra Young
Defendant:
Hot Springs Police Department, Larry Patrick, Scotty Dobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Hot Springs Police Department et al
as 2:2016cv06062
Plaintiff:
Myra Young
Defendant:
Hot Springs Police Department, Larry Patrick, Scotty Dobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Moore et al
as 3:2015cv03064
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen
Defendant:
Mike Moore, Boone County Detention Center, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Moore et al
as 4:2015cv00477
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen
Defendant:
Mike Moore, Boone County Detention Center, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
