Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Griffin v. Omaha Police Dept.
as 8:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Arthur James Griffin, Jr.
Respondent:
Omaha Police Dept and County Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Griffin v. Omaha, Cty- Prosecutor
as 8:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Arthur James Griffin, Jr.
Defendant:
Omaha, Cty- Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. County Prosecutor
as 8:2023cv00492
Petitioner:
Arthur T. Griffin
Respondent:
County Prosecutor
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chavez Lopez v. Douglas County Prosecutors Office et al
as 8:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Din G. Chavez Lopez
Defendant:
Douglas County Prosecutors Office and Douglas County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gee v. Douglas Cty, Prosecutor
as 8:2022cv00035
Petitioner:
Brian D. Gee
Respondent:
Douglas Cty, Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nielsen v. Douglas Cty Prosecutor
as 8:2022cv00024
Petitioner:
Dustin L. Nielsen
Respondent:
Douglas Cty Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Freeman v. Douglas Cty Prosecutor
as 8:2022cv00021
Petitioner:
Micah Freeman
Respondent:
Douglas Cty Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Griffin v. County Prosecutor
as 8:2020cv00388
Defendant:
County Prosecutor
Plaintiff:
Arthur James Griffin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ostdiek v. Sarpy County Court Prosecutor et al
as 8:2019cv00483
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Thomas Ostdiek
Defendant:
Sarpy County Court Prosecutor and Gage Cobb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Coffy et al
as 4:2015cv03033
Defendant:
Judge Coffy and Prosecutor Retelsdorf
Plaintiff:
Clyde Ernest Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
