Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02074
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
PSOMAS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv19880
Plaintiff: LEONIDAS PSOMAS and THE ESTATE OF CHARLOTTE HEARTLY
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC and others
In Re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fisher et al v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00350
Plaintiff: William Lee Fisher, Helen Gould, Donna Holzer and others
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company and ABC Corporations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Chatelain et al v. Nassau County Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv05360
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Chatelain
Defendant: Det. Walsh, Nassau County Police Department, P.O. Wolfer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
North American Capacity Insura v. Spiess Construction Co., Inc., et al
as 12-15027
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant: NORTH AMERICAN CAPACITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee: SPIESS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, STARWOOD CAPITAL GROUP GLOBAL I, LLC and others
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee: GOOD VALUE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Type: Contract Insurance
North American Capacity Insurance Company v Spiess Construction Co., Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00521
Plaintiff: North American Capacity Insurance Company
Defendant: Spiess Construction Co., Inc. , Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America , Good Value Construction, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant: Good Value Construction, Inc.
Counter_defendant: North American Capacity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
3-Rivers v. Toquerville Enterprises et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00742
Plaintiff: 3-Rivers
Defendant: Toquerville Enterprises, Jerald M. Spilsbury, Jerald M. Spilsbury and others
Cross Claimant: Summit-Hurricane Development and Toquerville Enterprises
ThirdParty Plaintiff: Summit-Hurricane Development and Toquerville Enterprises
Cross Defendant: ANB Financial NA
ThirdParty Defendant: ANB Financial NA, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and Situs Serve
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Type: Real Property None
Psomas v. Summit Development & Management et al
as 2:2009cv00743
Plaintiff: Psomas and Psomas
Defendant: Summit Development & Management, H&S Investments, Summit-Hurricane Development and others
Cross Claimant: Summit-Hurricane Development Incorporated and Toquerville Enterprises
ThirdParty Plaintiff: Summit-Hurricane Development Incorporated and Toquerville Enterprises
Cross Defendant: ANB Financial NA
ThirdParty Defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Situs Serve
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure
Type: Real Property Both
Bank of America N A v. WL Homes LLC
as 2:2009cv03737
Plaintiff: Bank of America N A, Bank of America N A and Bank of America N A
Defendant: WL Homes LLC, WL Parkway D Associates, L.P., WL Westlake Associates, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
SRK Consulting (U.S.) Inc. et al v. Psomas, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00611
Defendant: Psomas, Inc., Psomas, Inc., Black Corporations 1-9 and others
Plaintiff: SRK Consulting (U.S.) Inc., SRK Consulting (U.S.) Inc., AIG Commercial Insurance Company of Canada and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Real Property None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?