Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Rioux v. Publishers Clearing House et al
as 1:2022fp00129
Plaintiff:
Lee Ann Rioux
Defendant:
Publishers Clearing House and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00438
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
BOYLE v. PUBLISHERS CLEARING HOUSE et al
as 1:2020cv00834
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE BOYLE, TER BOYLE and T. BAYLIETH
Defendant:
JOHN CROSS, BRIAN VALLENTINE and PUBLISHERS CLEARING HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boldin v. Publishing Clearing House et al
as 3:2020cv00146
Defendant:
Publishing Clearing House and Andy Goldberg
Plaintiff:
Donna Fox Boldin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Publisher Clearing House, et al.
as 1:2019cv01592
Defendant:
Publisher Clearing House, Ohio Board of Education and Ohio Lottery
Plaintiff:
LaSalle Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Burks v. Publishers Clearing House et al
as 2:2019cv00450
Defendant:
Harland Clarke, Publishers Clearing House, Huntington Service Company and others
Plaintiff:
Buford L Burks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tennant v. Publishers Clearing House et al
as 1:2018cv22350
Plaintiff:
Douglas Tennant
Defendant:
Publishers Clearing House and Dave Sayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tennant v. Publishers Clearing House et al
as 1:2018cv22294
Plaintiff:
Douglas Tennant
Defendant:
Publishers Clearing House and Dave Sayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kitti Payne v. Publishers Clearing House, Inc, et al
as 16-16478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KITTI RUTH PAYNE, AKA Kitti Ruth Power
Defendant - Appellee:
PUBLISHERS CLEARING HOUSE, INC., MARGARET CROSSAN, DAVE SAYER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
