Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Pullen v. Globus Medical Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Matthew Pullen
Defendant:
Globus Medical Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
McRae v. Lockett et al
as 4:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Andre McRae
Defendant:
Charles Lockett, Michael Carvajal, Gene Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McRae v. Lockett et al
as 4:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Andre McRae
Defendant:
Charles Lockett, Michael Carvajal, Gene Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seiverd et al v. Arizona Elected Official Coup G.R.U. et al
as 3:2021cv08152
Defendant:
Douglas Anthony Ducey, One America News Network, CyTech Services and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Friedrich Seiverd and Weavel Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thompson v. Von Blanckensee et al
as 4:2019cv00562
Defendant:
M Vasquez, Unknown Wade, K Falconer and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Hank Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bells v. Von Blanckensee et al
as 4:2019cv00561
Defendant:
M Vasquez, Unknown Wade, K Falconer and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Buddha Bells, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bells et al v. Von Blanckensee et al
as 4:2019cv00538
Defendant:
M Vasquez, Unknown Wade, K Falconer and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Buddha Bells, Jr. and Gary Hank Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pullen v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01661
Petitioner:
Kevin Eugene Pullen
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vanaman v. Shartle et al
as 4:2015cv00311
Plaintiff:
Leslie Grey Vanaman
Defendant:
JT Shartle, L Molinar and Unknown Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pullen v. Samuels et al
as 4:2014cv02558
Plaintiff:
Charles Pullen
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Louis Winn, Jr. and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
