Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Henderson v. Sills et al
as 5:2011cv00297
Plaintiff:
JAMES CLARK HENDERSON
Defendant:
Howard Sills and Putnam County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arrott v. Putnam County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2011cv00020
Plaintiff:
William Scott Arrott
Defendant:
Putnam County Sheriffs Department, David Andrews and Jeremiah Sells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livulpi v. Putnam County Sheriff's Department et al
as 7:2011cv00066
Plaintiff:
Michael Livulpi
Defendant:
Putnam County Sheriff's Department , Matthew T. Monroe , John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. Smith et al
as 1:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Donald B. Smith , Putnam County Sheriff's Department and County of Putnam
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Doe v. Smith et al
as 7:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Donald B. Smith, Putnam County Sheriff's Department and County of Putnam
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Knox et al v. County of Putnam et al
as 7:2010cv01671
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Knox and Katherine C. Barramen
Defendant:
County of Putnam, Putnam County Sheriff's Department, Timothy R. Gannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rudolph v. Baldwin County Law Enforcement Center et al
as 5:2010cv00042
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Rudolph
Defendant:
Baldwin County Law Enforcement Center and Putnam County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tamar Osher v. Ann Jared, et al
as 09-6522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TAMAR OSHER
Defendant - Appellee:
ANN JARED, BENNETT JARED, BOB CRABTREE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-6523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Saunders, Jr. v. County of Putnam et al
as 7:2009cv06116
Plaintiff:
Alexander Saunders, Jr.
Defendant:
County of Putnam, Putnam County Sheriff's Department, Barbara Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
