Cases 21 - 30 of 198
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06482
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NAEDELE et al v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INC. et al
as 2:2020cv15881
Defendant:
LUDMILLA OLESNICKY, M.D., LAWRENCE TSAO, M.D., JANE ROES 51-100 and others
Plaintiff:
CHERYL NAEDELE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NAEDELE v. NAEDELE et al
as 2:2020cv15879
Plaintiff:
CHERYL NAEDELE
Defendant:
ZSOLT JOBBAGY, M.D., LUDMILLA OLESNICKY, M.D., LAWRENCE TSAO, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thacker v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00283
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Thacker
Defendant:
Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Ramon Olvera v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc., et al
as 20-55957
Defendant / Appellee:
UNILAB CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, DBA Quest Diagnostics, QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC., a business entity, DOES, 1-200 inclusive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMON OLVERA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McManus v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated et al
as 1:2019cv05449
Defendant:
EMA an Employee Cytotechnologist, of QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC., Name Unknown, VJQ an Employee Cytotechnologist, of QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC., Name Unknown and Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Emily McManus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
