Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Castello v. Quinstreet Pl, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Michelle Castello
Defendant:
Quinstreet Pl, Inc. doing business as Amone
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lyman v. Quinstreet, Inc.
as 5:2023cv05056
Plaintiff:
Maxx Lyman
Defendant:
Quinstreet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Nickson v. Quinstreet Inc.
as 8:2022cv01166
Plaintiff:
Beaufort Nickson
Defendant:
Quinstreet Inc. doing business as Insure.com
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pizarro v. Quinstreet, Inc.
as 3:2022cv02803
Plaintiff:
Sharon Pizarro
Defendant:
Quinstreet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pizarro v. Quinstreet PL Inc. d/b/a AmOne
as 1:2021cv10139
Plaintiff:
Sharon Pizarro
Defendant:
Quinstreet PL Inc. d/b/a AmOne and Quinstreet PL Inc. a California Corporation doing business as AmOne
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Margolias v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv01765
Plaintiff:
Eric Margolias
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company and Quinstreet Incorporated Health and Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Baker v. SunPower Corporation et al
as 5:2021cv00790
Plaintiff:
Tyler Baker
Defendant:
SunPower Corporation, Modernize Inc. and QuinStreet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Baker v. QuinStreet Media, Inc.
as 3:2020cv05632
Plaintiff:
Tyler Baker
Defendant:
QuinStreet Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Ayman Mousa v. Quinstreet, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01136
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them, Quinstreet, Inc. and Quinstreet, Inc. doing business as Debthelp.com
Plaintiff:
Ayman Mousa
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
