Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Lobato Quito v. Garland
as 24-1297
Petitioner:
MILTON WLADIMIR LOBATO QUITO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Nehemiah v. OPM
as 24-1575
Petitioner:
QUITO I. NEHEMIAH
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Quituisaca-Quito v. Garland
as 24-59
Petitioner:
DAVID MAURICIO QUITUISACA-QUITO, LOURDES SUSANA AREVALO-CABRERA and AUSTIN JAEL QUITISACA AREVALO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Millet (Roman)
as 24-18
Defendant:
RICHARD MORALES, HECTOR LUIS RIOS, MARIA VIDRO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MANUEL E. ROMAN, Manny and Pito
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ortiz-Chusino v. Garland
as 24-27
Petitioner:
CHRISTIAN ALEXANDER ORTIZ-CHUSINO, KERLY ABIGAIL ORTIZ-SIGUENZA, ANN GABRIELA SIGUENZA-QUITO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bermejo-Quito v. Garland
as 23-8077
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS BERMEJO-QUITO, ANTHONY JHOEL BERMEJO-RODRIGUEZ, DYLAN ALEXANDER BERMEJO-RODRIGUEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
SHP Quito Village, LLC v. Yi et al
as 3:2023cv02120
Plaintiff:
SHP Quito Village, LLC
Defendant:
Jin Ho Yi, Sang Hoon Yi, Elite Cleaners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Simon Quito-Guachichulca v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-1069
Petitioner:
Simon Gavino Quito-Guachichulca
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
