Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Incorrectly filed
as 4:2021cv03285
Plaintiff:
Super Micro Computer, Inc. and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
R. Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Super Micro Computer, Inc. v. R Associates, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv07975
Defendant:
Thomas A. Burg Bar No. 211937 Bialson Bergen M Bialson, Bergen & Schwab and R Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Super Micro Computer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
U.S. Hotel and Resort Mgt., et al v. Onity, Inc.
as 14-3013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
U.S. Hotel and Resort Management, Inc., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Regency Hotel Management, LLC, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Motiram Corporation, doing business as Days Inn, Forest, MS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Onity, Inc.
Sai Nath Krupa Investments Inc v Onity, Inc.
as 0:2013cv02872
Plaintiff:
Sai Nath Krupa Investments, Inc. , C&R Associates, Inc. and Sai Ram of Pensacola, Inc.
Defendant:
Onity, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAI NATH KRUPA INVESTMENTS INC et al v. ONITY INC
as 3:2013cv00504
Plaintiff:
SAI NATH KRUPA INVESTMENTS INC , C&R ASSOCIATES INC and SAI RAM OF PENSACOLA INC
Defendant:
ONITY INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bricklayers Insurance Welfare Fund et al v. A&R Associates, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01830
Defendant:
A&R Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Labor Management Relations Committee, Bricklayers Local 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Aspen Insurance UK Limited v. A & R Able Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv00261
Plaintiff:
Aspen Insurance UK Limited
Defendant:
A & R Able Corp., AR&R Associates, Inc. and Jerome Marzan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
