Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Elizabeth De Coster et al v. Newegg, Inc.
as 2:2023mc00166
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth De Coster, Maya Gold, John Mariane and others
Defendant:
Newegg, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv08650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
(PC) King v. Lemos, et al.
as 1:2020cv01837
Defendant:
J. W. Sullivan, Lemos, K. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
David King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Reinhardt v. W. Hamlin, et al
as 20-15500
Defendant / Appellee:
BRAD R. HILL, Administrative Presiding Justice to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, KATHLEEN A. MEEHAN, Associate Justice to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, STEPHEN J. KANE, Associate Justice to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MICHAEL REINHARDT
Frame-Wilson et al v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2020cv00424
Plaintiff:
Christian Sabol, Deborah Frame-Wilson, Gail Murphy and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01881
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Reinhardt v. Hamlin et al
as 1:2019cv00892
Defendant:
Kathleen A. Meehan, Arlan Harrell, Brad R. Hill and others
Plaintiff:
David Michael Reinhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reinhardt v. Hamlin
as 5:2019cv02343
Defendant:
Gary Hoff, Arlan Harrell, W. Kent Hamlin and others
Plaintiff:
David Michael Reinhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hills et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2017cv07216
Plaintiff:
David Hills and Consuelo R Hills
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
George Bridgette v. Donald Hill, et al
as 17-56867
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE BRIDGETTE
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD R. HILL, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and DANIEL E. LUNGREN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
