Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackwell v. Jenkins, et al.
as 24-201
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY KARL BLACKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
A. JENKINS
Defendant:
E. BARTKIEWIECZ, T. PRAKASH, IGOR DMYTRIENKO and others
McFadden v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Patrick R. McFadden
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
MCFADDEN JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv95559
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERSON R MCFADDEN JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Cole v. McFadden-Jensen et al
as 3:2020cv06400
Defendant:
B. Stacy, R. McFadden-Jensen, R. Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Stein Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Blackwell v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2019cv00442
Defendant:
Joe Lizaraga, D. Hardie, R. McFadden and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Karl Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Germain v. Janam ,et al.
as 1:2018cv01597
Defendant:
R. Rodriguez, Mercado, B. Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Germain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Germain v. Janam ,et al.
as 2:2018cv03041
Defendant:
R. Rodriguez, Mercado, B. Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Germain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Cole v. McFadden-Jensen et al
as 2:2018cv02596
Defendant:
B. Stacy, K. Hoffman, R. McFadden-Jensen and others
Plaintiff:
Stein Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. McFadden-Jensen et al
as 2:2018cv00613
Plaintiff:
Lambert G. Chambers
Defendant:
R. McFadden-Jensen, B. Stacy, C. Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
