Cases 1 - 10 of 43
HARNEY v. HORTH et al
as 2:2023cv00360
Petitioner:
MELVIN WES HARNEY
Respondent:
GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARIES F. MILLER, MIA E. KELSAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerry Smith v. Indiana Parole Board, et al
as 23-1866
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY A. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, G. HORTH, THOR R. MILLER and others
HARNEY v. SCHULTZ et al
as 2:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
MELVIN WES HARNEY
Defendant:
ZACHARY SCHULTZ, CHARLES F. MILLER, MIA E. KELSAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. NCF et al
as 1:2021cv01794
Defendant:
FREDERICK A. MEDLEY, JAMES W. SHAFFER, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PASSMORE et al v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2020cv00586
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., G.M. HORTH, ERIC J. HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PASSMORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE-BEY v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2020cv00147
Plaintiff:
DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY
Defendant:
FREDRICK A. MEDLEY, JAMES W. SHAFFER, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Brake et al
as 3:2019cv00801
Plaintiff:
Santrell R Miller
Defendant:
S Brake, Annderson, Daniel Q Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Brake et al
as 1:2019cv04513
Plaintiff:
Santrell R Miller
Defendant:
S Brake, Annderson, Daniel Q. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Circuit Court of Rock Island County et al
as 1:2019cv04357
Plaintiff:
Santrell R Miller
Defendant:
Circuit Court Of Cook County, Illinois State Police and Circuit Court of Rock Island County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Cook County Jail Medical Staff et al
as 1:2019cv04360
Plaintiff:
Santrell R Miller
Defendant:
IDOC Medical Staff and Cook County Jail Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
