Cases 1 - 10 of 220,716
WILGUS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
JAMES VINCENT WILGUS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, ANTHONY J. BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Carr v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65507
Plaintiff:
Jennifer R Carr
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McColum v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv01037
Plaintiff:
Mone R McColum
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Thompson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02411
Plaintiff:
Angelia Thompson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sotomayor v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02402
Plaintiff:
Markanthony Sotomayor
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stiff v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02409
Plaintiff:
Timothy Stiff
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Valerio v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02412
Plaintiff:
Jesus Valerio
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KING v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 2:2024cv00704
Petitioner:
JAMES KING
Respondent:
KENNETH R. HOLLIBAUGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02366
Plaintiff:
Shari Anderson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Byro v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02371
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Byro
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
