Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Ceasar v. Santander et al
as 5:2020cv01115
Defendant:
Bob Giles, Santander, Santander Consumer U S A and others
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Ronnie R Ceasar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ceasar v. Bercier Dentistry et al
as 5:2020cv00930
Defendant:
Bercier Dentistry and Owner of Bercier Dentistry
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* R Ceasar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ceasar v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2020cv00767
Defendant:
Matt Scruggins, Randy Wagley and Patrick Jenkins
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* R Ceasar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ceasar v. Dancy et al
as 5:2020cv00753
Defendant:
V A Disruptive Behavior Committee, Peter Dancy and Paul Milk
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* R Ceasar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ceasar v. Veterans Administration Medical Center of Alexandria et al
as 5:2020cv00611
Defendant:
Veterans Administration Medical Center of Alexandria, Peter Dancy and Hamilton
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* R Ceasar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ceasar v. Oberlin et al
as 5:2020cv00594
Defendant:
Town of Oberlin, Police Dept of Oberlin, Unnamed Complainant and others
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* R Ceasar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ceasar v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative Inc et al
as 5:2020cv00424
Defendant:
Kay Foy, Beauregard Electric Cooperative Inc and Louisiana Public Service Commission
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* R Ceasar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ceasar v. Woodforest Bank et al
as 5:2020cv00344
Defendant:
Woodforest Bank and Tele-Check Services of Houston
Plaintiff:
Sanctioned/Barred R Ceasar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ceasar v. Wal-Mart Nelson Rd et al
as 5:2020cv00328
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Nelson Rd and Len
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* R Ceasar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ceasar v. Wal-Mart Nelson Rd et al
as 2:2020cv00328
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Nelson Rd and Len
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* R Ceasar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
