Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Ceasar v. St Landry Homestead FSB et al
as 5:2018cv01096
Defendant:
St Landry Homestead FSB, Board of Directors St Landry Homestead, President/CEO St Landry Homestead and others
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* R Ceasar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ceasar v. Veterans Administration et al
as 5:2018cv01067
Defendant:
Veterans Administration, Peter Dancy and V A M C
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* R Ceasar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv02350
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
R. Ceasar v. Veterans Admin Med Ctr, et al
as 18-30855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. CEASAR, Doctor
Defendant - Appellee:
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL CENTER OF NEW ORLEANS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
R. Ceasar v. Veterans Administration, et al
as 18-30854
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. CEASAR
Defendant - Appellee:
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, of New Orleans, Louisiana and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Ceasar v. Opelousas et al
as 5:2018cv00928
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* R Ceasar
Defendant:
City of Opelousas and Ms Lisa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ceasar v. Veterans Administration et al
as 2:2018cv06722
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury, Veterans Administration and Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
R. Ceasar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
R. Ceasar v. Capital One Bank, et al
as 18-30736
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. CEASAR
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPITAL ONE BANK, CHASE BANK, REGIONS BANK and others
Ceasar v. Jeff Davis Bank et al
as 5:2018cv00762
Plaintiff:
R Ceasar
Defendant:
Jeff Davis Bank, Quentin Corbello, Chex Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
