Cases 11 - 20 of 23
MARTIN v. CARTER et al
as 1:2019cv01619
Defendant:
J. GRIFFITH, C. COOKE, R. CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, LLC. et al
as 1:2019cv00886
Defendant:
F. MCKINNEY, WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, LLC., WYTTE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. ALSIP et al
as 1:2018cv03839
Defendant:
PRAITOR, BARGIT, BYDEM and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ofori et al v. Clarke et al
as 7:2018cv00587
Defendant:
Ms. Happer, Mr. D/S Collins, B.L. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Stephens, Anthony Roberts, Waverly Whitlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holley v. Meredith et al
as 7:2018cv00535
Defendant:
Hensley, Mr. Rivero, Mr. Marcus Elam and others
Plaintiff:
Garfield W Holley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYDEN v. BYERS et al
as 1:2015cv02084
Defendant:
S. BYERS, R. COCHRAN and SHAW
Plaintiff:
DAVID WAYNE HAYDEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochrane v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00522
Defendant:
L. Adams, Alfasi, Romeo Aranas and others
Plaintiff:
Terry R. Cochrane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00298
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cochrane v. Baker et al
as 3:2013cv00077
Respondent:
Renee Baker and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Terry R. Cochrane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cochrane v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2012cv00473
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Robert Bannister, Baze and others
Plaintiff:
Terry R. Cochrane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
