Cases 11 - 20 of 37
David James Pangborn v. Director of CDCR et al
as 2:2019cv02503
Plaintiff:
David James Pangborn
Defendant:
R. Clemons, Director of CDCR, K. Bradford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Germaine Lake-Crunk v. City of Houston Plce Dept, et al
as 18-20372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERMAINE D. LAKE-CRUNK
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Sued in its Official Capacity, B. M. BOGORAD, Houston Police Department Police Officer, Sued in his Individual and Official Capacity, L. R. CLEMONS, Houston Police Department Internal Affairs Detective Sergeant, Sued in his Individual and Official Capacity and others
Clemons v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv00824
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Wanda R. Clemons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ciron B. Springfield v. Elwart et al
as 2:2017cv09123
Defendant:
T. Case, T. Case, R. Clemons and others
Plaintiff:
Ciron B Springfield
Clemons v. Davis
as 4:2017cv03491
Petitioner:
Tommy R Clemons
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lawrence Clemons v. Metro Govt of Nashville
as 16-5255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE R. CLEMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE & DAVIDSON COUNTY
Clemons v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00389
Plaintiff:
Wanda R. Clemons
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Oscar Machado v. J. Soto et al
as 2:2014cv09894
Defendant:
E. Cardenas, R. Clemons, R. Navarrette and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Machado
Clemons v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee
as 3:2014cv01690
Plaintiff:
Lawrence R. Clemons
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Martinez v. Clemons
as 4:2014cv01880
Plaintiff:
Sergio Martinez
Defendant:
Lisa R Clemons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
