Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Christopher Hall v. Mark Wahl, et al
as 24-1525
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MARK WAHL, UNIT MANAGER MICHAEL SKUTACK, UNIT MANAGER JOE D'EANGLES and others
Hall v. Wahl et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Hall
Defendant:
Mark Wahl, T. McDermott, George M. Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Hall v. Detective Shawn Nisbit, et al
as 23-2616
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
DETECTIVE SHAWN NISBIT
Christopher Hall v. Mark Wahl, et al
as 23-2344
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MARK WAHL, Superintendent at SCI Waymart, GEORGE LITTLE, Acting Secretary of Corrections and T. MCDERMOTT, Grievance Coordinator
DEMASE v. RITTENOUR et al
as 2:2023cv01197
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY N. DEMASE
Defendant:
JASON E. RITTENOUR, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and SHAUNTAI LEILANI R. HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Hall v. Wahl et al
as 3:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Hall
Defendant:
Superintendent Mark Wahl, T. McDermott and George M. Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Hall v. Shawn Nsbit, et al
as 23-1535
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
DETECTIVE SHAWN NSBIT
Christopher Hall v. Shawn Nisbit, et al
as 21-2139
Defendant / Appellee:
DETECTIVE SHAWN NISBIT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
HALL v. NISBIT et al
as 2:2019cv04382
Defendant:
SERGEANT OSWALDO TOLEDO, OFFICER RAYMOND TOWNSEND, MUNICIPAL TOWNSHIP BUILDING and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv04535
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. HALL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
