Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Defendant:
United States, Merrick B. Garland, John G. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rubin Lublin LLC v. Bryant et al
as 2:2020cv00395
Defendant:
Jon Michael Bryant, Jr, D R Jones, Allison B Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Rubin Lublin LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Poole v. Devine et al
as 4:2020cv00117
Plaintiff:
LaShawn Murrell Poole
Defendant:
R. Jones, Alex Burgess, John Key and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Brown et al
as 2:2016cv01505
Plaintiff:
Anthony R Jones
Defendant:
Jeremy Brown, Troy Hart and Landon Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Congress et al v. Morefield et al
as 2:2016cv00909
Plaintiff:
Ashley Congress and Unique Congress
Defendant:
James Morefield, Jr, Ronald R Jones and R&K Stoner Logistics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00650
Plaintiff:
Nicholas R. Jones
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Adams, et al. v. Ambassador Personnel, Inc., et al. (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2014cv00900
Plaintiff:
Anthony Adams , Billy Andrews , Quincy Armstrong and others
Defendant:
Ambassador Personnel, Inc. , Ambassador Personnel of Alabama, Inc. and Guyoung Tech USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jones v. Buckner et al
as 2:2012cv02749
Plaintiff:
Ahmad R Jones
Defendant:
Nancy T Buckner, C Johnson, Alicia J Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Mobile County Metro Jail et al
as 1:2012cv00378
Plaintiff:
Dennis Morgan Hicks
Defendant:
Mobile County Metro Jail, Lt. Houston, Herman Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Hooteh et al
as 4:2012cv00799
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
J Hooteh, R Hooteh, W Howard and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
