Cases 1 - 10 of 16
GIORDANO v. TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER et al
as 3:2020cv18432
Defendant:
J. EVERETT, R. RAHNER, A. PACIULLI and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIORDANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buchman et al v. Hutchison et al
as 3:2017cv01213
Plaintiff:
Scott Buchman , Dennis Noneman and Jody L. Zink
Defendant:
Scott Hutchison, John R. Parent and Geri M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
First Federal Bank of the Midwest v. Hutchison et al
as 3:2017cv00768
Plaintiff:
First Federal Bank of the Midwest
Defendant:
Scott Hutchison, John R Parent and Clerk of the United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Scott Hutchison v. John Parent
as 16-4194
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
SCOTT HUTCHISON
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
JOHN R. PARENT
M. R., et al v. Ridley School District
as 16-2465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M. R. and J. R., Parents of Minor Child E.R.
Defendant - Appellee:
RIDLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Scott Hutchison v. John Parent
as 15-3604
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTT HUTCHISON
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN R. PARENT
Appellee:
THOMAS S. DANFORD
L.R. v. Philadelphia School District, et al
as 14-4640
Plaintiff - Appellee:
L. R., Parent and Natural Guardian of N.R., a minor
Defendant - Appellant:
PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL DISTRICT, PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL DISTRICT REFORM COMMISSION and REGINALD M. LITTLEJOHN
Scott Hutchison v. John Parent, et al
as 14-3098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT HUTCHISON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN R. PARENT and THOMAS S. DANFORD
Sturdevant v. Winklemeirer et al
as 3:2013cv00519
Plaintiff:
Norbert Sturdevant
Defendant:
M Winklemeirer, K Waggnor, P. Trovillion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M. R., et al v. Ridley School District
as 12-4137
Plaintiff - Appellee:
M. R. and J. R., PARENTS OF MINOR CHILD E.R.
Defendant - Appellant:
RIDLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
